Warning: Constant MCF_PERF_DELAY_JS already defined in /home/staging_wklaw/www/wp-config.php on line 95
San Diego Arson Lawyers: Orange County Arson Attorneys
Aerial view of Chicago downtown skyline with tall skyscrapers and cityscape stretching to the horizon

45+ Years Criminal Defense

Experience in California

OCMETRO logo with text and geometric design elements in light grayBBB Accredited Business Logo with A+ RatingAvvo 10.0 Superb Rating - Excellent Criminal Defense Attorney BadgeLawyers.com 5.0 out of 5 rating badge with circular icon and textSuper Lawyers logo in gray outline style text on white background
Table of Contents

Arson Defenses - Penal Code Section 451

Defendant Lacked the Requisite Intent to Commit Arson Under California Arson law, the defendant must have set the fire willfully and maliciously. In order to be convicted of this crime, the prosecution must prove that the defendant's illegal act or omission occurred intentionally and without regard to motive or ignorance of the act's prohibited character. The specific intent to set fire to or burn or cause to be burned the relevant structure or forest land is not an element of arson. As such, the prosecution must show that the person knew what he or she was doing, intended to do it, and was acting as a free agent without coercion in setting any relevant structure on fire. The Defendant Caused the Fire, but it was an Accident If the fire was a result of an accident, then the defendant cannot be convicted of felony arson. In fact if we can establish that the fire was the result of an accident then this can result in our client being acquitted or the charges dismissed. If it can be shown that the fire was started "accidentally" then in order for the accused to be found guilty of misdemeanor arson the prosecution must show each of the following: 1.That the accused was aware that his or her actions presented a substantial and unjustifiable risk of causing a fire; 2.That the defendant ignored that risk; and 3.That ignoring the risk was a gross deviation from what a reasonable person would have done in the same situation. Intoxication May be a Defense to Arson Arson is a general intent crime. Therefore, voluntary intoxication is not a legal defense to arson. In fact, the law emphasizes a strong relationship between alcohol intoxication and arson, and it would be anomalous to allow evidence of intoxication to relieve a person of responsibility for this crime. However, involuntary intoxication is a legal defense to this crime, and the defendant may be allowed to offer such evidence to negate the element of intent.
Call Wallin and Klarich today at (877) 466-5245. We will be there when you call.

Search our site

Our California Locations
irvine
18022 Cowan # 285, Irvine, CA 92614
San Bernardino
225 W Hospitality Ln Suite 319, San Bernardino, CA 92408
Riverside
7177 Brockton Avenue Suite 339 Riverside, CA 92506
Victorville
15437 Anacapa Rd Unit 12, Victorville, CA 92392
Torrance
21151 S Western Ave #233, Torrance, CA 90501
Anaheim

1161 Raymond Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801

tustin
17592 Irvine Blvd, Tustin, CA 92780
san diego
444 W C St, #410, San Diego, CA 92101
barstow
400 S. 2nd Ave, Suite 206, Barstow, CA 92311
west covina
1619 West Garvey Ave N, #107, West Covina, CA 91790
long beach
5199 Pacific Coast Highway # 604, Long Beach, CA 90804

Follow Us

Request A Free Confidential Consultation

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

chevron-down